Comments on: Wordpress performs poorly. http://raybdbomb.com/p/wordpress-performs-poorly.html Incessant babble and otherwise blarg Sun, 14 Mar 2010 01:51:39 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0-alpha hourly 1 By: Raybdbomb http://raybdbomb.com/p/wordpress-performs-poorly.html/comment-page-1#comment-22891 Raybdbomb Sat, 24 Mar 2007 23:20:29 +0000 http://raybdbomb.com/p/wordpress-performs-poorly.html#comment-22891 I responded <a href="http://www.digmann.com/2007/03/24/wordpress-performs-poorly-intensionally.html#comment-259" rel="nofollow">on your post</a>. I responded on your post.

]]> By: Dustin http://raybdbomb.com/p/wordpress-performs-poorly.html/comment-page-1#comment-22889 Dustin Sat, 24 Mar 2007 21:24:48 +0000 http://raybdbomb.com/p/wordpress-performs-poorly.html#comment-22889 I wrote a devil's advocate post about this topic here: http://www.digmann.com/2007/03/24/wordpress-performs-poorly-intensionally.html . I wrote a devil’s advocate post about this topic here: http://www.digmann.com/2007/03/24/wordpress-performs-poorly-intensionally.html .

]]> By: Digmann.com » Blog Archive » Wordpress Performs Poorly - Intensionally http://raybdbomb.com/p/wordpress-performs-poorly.html/comment-page-1#comment-22888 Digmann.com » Blog Archive » Wordpress Performs Poorly - Intensionally Sat, 24 Mar 2007 21:24:27 +0000 http://raybdbomb.com/p/wordpress-performs-poorly.html#comment-22888 [...] One of the guys I went to school with, Ray, has created a post about how Wordpress performs poorly requiring sites to install extra ‘patches’ to f.... [...] [...] One of the guys I went to school with, Ray, has created a post about how Wordpress performs poorly requiring sites to install extra ‘patches’ to f…. [...]

]]> By: Raybdbomb http://raybdbomb.com/p/wordpress-performs-poorly.html/comment-page-1#comment-22878 Raybdbomb Sat, 24 Mar 2007 07:30:25 +0000 http://raybdbomb.com/p/wordpress-performs-poorly.html#comment-22878 Right, but the point is it should be a part of the core, not an add-on. Maybe it will be in the future? BTW, how did you find this post? Right, but the point is it should be a part of the core, not an add-on. Maybe it will be in the future?

BTW, how did you find this post?

]]> By: Matt http://raybdbomb.com/p/wordpress-performs-poorly.html/comment-page-1#comment-22875 Matt Sat, 24 Mar 2007 00:55:11 +0000 http://raybdbomb.com/p/wordpress-performs-poorly.html#comment-22875 WP-Cache isn't a patch, it's a plugin that we specifically wrote extensions to core WP to allow it to work better. And it does work great, you can easily serve several million pageviews a day off a properly configured box with wp-cache installed. WP-Cache isn’t a patch, it’s a plugin that we specifically wrote extensions to core WP to allow it to work better. And it does work great, you can easily serve several million pageviews a day off a properly configured box with wp-cache installed.

]]> By: Brandon http://raybdbomb.com/p/wordpress-performs-poorly.html/comment-page-1#comment-22862 Brandon Thu, 22 Mar 2007 22:56:12 +0000 http://raybdbomb.com/p/wordpress-performs-poorly.html#comment-22862 I completely agree with you. Wordpress is fine if you either have hosted "blogging" service from wordpress, or aren't expecting much traffic. If you do get hit, it goes down extremely fast. Unfortunately, I don't have the time or patience (or knowhow) to sit and write my own site with as much power and flexibility as wordpress. It would be extremely helpful for them to write cleaner running code, however at the moment, I don't think I have anything to worry about, traffic wise. I'll look into WP-Cache and see if I can get it to work, though I agree that a patch isn't really the right way to go with something this important. I completely agree with you. Wordpress is fine if you either have hosted “blogging” service from wordpress, or aren’t expecting much traffic. If you do get hit, it goes down extremely fast. Unfortunately, I don’t have the time or patience (or knowhow) to sit and write my own site with as much power and flexibility as wordpress. It would be extremely helpful for them to write cleaner running code, however at the moment, I don’t think I have anything to worry about, traffic wise.

I’ll look into WP-Cache and see if I can get it to work, though I agree that a patch isn’t really the right way to go with something this important.

]]>